Archive

Archive for October, 2005

Happy Halloween!

October 31st, 2005

So, yesterday afternoon Jessica and I went out to get pumpkins to carve. Its become a bit of a tradition for us over the last several years that we both really enjoy. Since we went out on the day before Halloween, pickings were a bit slim, but we managed to find a couple good ones.

We got them home about 5:00 and started in on cleaning them out. That was the easy part. Neither of us has ever attempted what we were about to do — complex patterns. In previous years, we would just kind of look at some pictures or do something freehand. We started carving about 6:00 or so. Three hours later, here is what we ended up with. Jessica’s is on the left, mine on the right:

Carved Pumpkins

They don’t look like too much just sitting on the table like that. Just like ordinary pumpkins, really. Put a candle in them and turn off the lights and its a different story:

Carved Pumpkins - Lit

Next year we’ve decided to start a day or two earlier. A three hour carving marathon is a bit more than either one of us was expecting. We liked the results though.

marc Ego

MP3 Player Update

October 17th, 2005

Quick update on the MP3 player project. I spent several hours yesterday looking at cases, embedded systems, and got really, really frustrated. The Home Theater PC (HTPC) is just now starting to catch on, but the manufacturers are charging way too much for a case. Granted, these are some really nice looking cases, but the prices they want for some of them took them right out of the running.

After looking at the pricing for the AllWell STB’s thats what I decided on. Today I ordered a Metallic6086N2 and a Maxtor 250G 5400RPM hard drive, not the fastest, but it will run quetly and without a lot of heat. I’ll post pictures when the items arrive.

marc Projects

Simple Set Top MP3 Player

October 15th, 2005

For a couple years now, Jessica has wanted a simple, standalone MP3 player that she could put on her desk or on a shelf, or entertainment cabinet or someplace else thats out of the way. Thats all it needs to do is play MP3’s, have a simple LCD or VFD display on it to show what song is playing and have a web or other interface to make and save playlists. Oh, and it needs to have a hard drive in it to store all this stuff. Software MP3 players for Windows try to do too much and be too flashy. Plus she wants to be able to stream or otherwise listen to music in other rooms of the house. So this means a full fledged computer is out of the question. Too much power, too loud, too expensive just for this purpose.

Last year I thought I found the answer. I got her a HomePod from Macsense and an 80G Maxtor USB drive. It was small, fanless (i.e. quiet) and had a nice simple interface for playing from the attached USB drive. Unfortunately, it didn’t live up to its claims. Its slow, locks up frequently and is a royal pain to use. She doesn’t use it unless she is desparate for music, and even then she would rather grab our Rio Cali and use that with headphones. Its also not overly attractive because it stands by itself and then you have this big bulky USB chassis next to it.

The concept of it was quite good, though. I’ve been continuing my quest for this device and most of the things I’ve found are either way to expensive ($1499 or more), don’t have the right features (remember, I want this simple), require a stream or other software to be playing on your computer, or are just plain ugly. I’ve been searching for this device for years now. No luck.

So, I’ve decided to build my own and write about the hell I’m sure to go through here, maybe in the hopes to spare some other poor and unfortunate soul from going through the same thing I have.

I’ve promised her this device for Christmas, so now I have to deliver or I’ll probably never hear the end of it. As I was typing this she was reading of my shoulder. She simply looked at me, gave me a wry smile and said “You’re right.” The pressure is on.

A quick review of the requirements:

  • Small
  • Internal hard drive
  • Remote control for play, stop, pause, fast forward, reverse, etc.
  • LCD or VFD for display of the current song
  • Web interface for managing playlists
  • Quiet

Doesn’t sound that difficult to accomplish, but sadly, it is.

I have narrowed down the software I’m going to use, at least. It will of course be running Linux of some sort. Probably a derivative of Damn Small Linux or maybe Fedora, but probably the former since I want this system to be light-weight since the processor will probably be a Via Eden or something else with relatively low processing power.

I’ve also selected the player software, that will be the Music Player Daemon. It is simple, well documented and stable. It doesn’t require a GUI and its client/server approach is perfect for everything I need. The latest test versions even let you send to a Shoutcast or Icecast server that will take care of my need to stream it to other rooms in the house using something like the HomePod or Netgear’s Wireless Digital Music Player, though I haven’t tested it yet. Samba will be used for her to transfer files to and from it and as a nice bonus it will give her someplace to back up her laptop. The remote control stuff will all be done with LIRC and probably the mpc command line tool for MPD.

The web interface I’m going to write myself since all of the others that I’ve looked at are horrible. They try to cram way to much onto a single page and aren’t intuitave at all. I’ll be using B. Carlisle’s mpd-class for PHP as the interface, though I’m a bit leary of it. Within my first 5 minutes of toying around with it I found a serious design bug in it, I was able to fix it without any problems, and I’ll send it to him. As long as I don’t run into any other serious problems, it will be a good framework. The interface itself will be simple, much like a portable MP3 player. All of the elements of it will be different sections, i.e. one area for playlists, one area to view the loaded playlist, one area to show the current information and status. Ideally, she would be able to interface with the device using her PDA, so the web interface must be very light weight. Plus on a low powere CPU, smaller is better.

The hardware is an entirely different story. Thats the part thats giving me the most grief. I’ve been looking seriously at the GTC Allwell set top boxes, because they have the right mix of size and performance, as well as built in LAN and audio. They also have MPEG hardware and TV output which is less important for me, but someday I might want to branch this out a bit more into something that can also do video playback on a TV. I doubt it since it would expand my simple requirements, but its nice to have the option. The metallic model has an exposed 5.25″ drive bay that I can put an LCD into, such as the Thermaltake Media Lab or a Crystalfontz LCD Module and an internal 3.5″ hard drive. The problem is that the 6802NC2 unit seems like the drive bay is curved and I don’t know if the LCD would fit seamlessly. Plus, when you’re dealing with silver colors, color matching isn’t always easy. I would prefer black, but thats not an option in this unit.

Another option I’ve encountered is the Cooler Master CM Media 260 case. The big down side with this is that its a full fledged PC. I’d then have to go get a motherboard, CPU and memory. By the time I did all that, it would be kind of pointless and “why not just get a silent computer” to run it. I may go with this route since the case is nice, is available in black, and does have the option for a VFD and remote control.

I have decided on the hard drive I’m going to use at least. I can’t remember who makes it, but its a 300G 5400RPM drive. Big and quiet. Speed isn’t important.

As I progress with this project, I’ll post updates….

marc Projects

Serenity

October 8th, 2005

Okay, let me just get this out of the way now so people don’t complain. This post contains spoilers! If you haven’t yet seen the movie and want to be surprised by it, then don’t read this post.

So, Wednesday night Jessica and I met Joe at the theater to go see Serenity. All three of us were quite excited about it, I mean we almost never go see a movie in the theater. The last time we went to a theater to see a movie was more than two years ago. With Serenity it was different, though. We’re all Firefly fans, and the rumor was that if Serenity did well at the box office and then in the DVD market, that there was a good chance for another movie or even the return of the series. We’re all for more Firefly, in movie, TV or DVD’s, we’ll take what we can get.

Once the credits started rolling and the lights in the theater came back up, Jessica seemed irritated, so I questioned her about it. She was quite upset about the killing off of two of the main characters, as well as the way things ended. She and I talked about it for a while afterward and what follows are the conclusions and impressions I got after thinking about it a bit more.

So, after seeing it, and talking about it with Jessica here are my opinions. Again, I wasn’t kidding — there are SPOILERS here! Read no further if that bothers you.

Let me start by saying the casting of the main characters is great. All of the actors seem quite comfortable in their roles, which really helps to make their characters believable. There is a lot of well written dialog and great one liners spread throughout the movie. Production quality was fair, but it could have been much better. Some of the scenes were extremely well done, like near the beginning as the camera follows Mal through the ship; there are no cuts or fades at all for several minutes as he makes his way through the entire ship and re-introduces you to the crew and ship. Scenes like that are hard to pull off and this one was done flawlessly.

One of the things that I noticed while watching the previews was that in all of the scenes there were two key characters missing, Anara and Shephard Book. I had a feeling this didn’t bode well for those characters. I did see Ron Glass’ name in the credits, so I knew he was in the movie, but it was only a very small role. I think his part was more for the people that watched the series than anything else. It was quite upsetting when he was killed off by the main bad-guy. Not surprising, but upsetting. His character could have remained a solid set of story lines by slowly exposing us to his past life before he was a shephard. There was also no background on these, or any of the characters at all. You had no idea why these people were together or why any one of them was significant. The only way to know this was from the series.

Let me go on a bit about my “more for the people that watched the series” comment. Throughout the whole movie, things felt a bit “off”. I don’t know if it was Joss Whedon’s doing or if it was the studio’s doing, but the characters and the story seemed adapted for the big screen and mass market appeal. Many things changed in the movie from the series. For example, River in this movie became a psychic. Okay, no problem there. We knew that there were lots of experiments on her, and the series ended before explaining a lot of it, so this one could be believable. What bothered me was that during the series, the principal villians were “two by two, hands of blue”. They were creepy, ominous fellows that you didn’t want to trifle with. They were replaced by a single bad guy. Granted the guy they chose to cast in this role played it very well and they pulled it off well. What I had a problem with was there was never any guys with blue hands. It was just suddenly *BAM* here is the bad guy. There could have been a bit more reference to the previous bad guys. I’m not sure why the formula in movies for bad guys is always a single super villain that always gets defeated. Its not necessary and its quite pandering. An enemy that is as mysterious as the guys with blue hands is just as effective and you don’t end up in that same tired movie formula: Here is the bad guy, here is the good guy, bad guy keeps getting the better of the good guy until the end where the good guy wins. I guess Hollywood likes to stick to a single thing that they think will work. Its no wonder movies aren’t doing as well as they used to, there is nothing new being done. It really does make me wonder just how many concessions Mr. Whedon made with the studios in order to get Serenity made, or if he’s lost his touch after being away from it for so long.

On to the part that was really bothersome. Why did Wash have to die? It was pointless and didn’t add anything to the story. The only thing it did for the three of us was piss us off. Jessica was so mad about it that she will probably give up on the whole franchise. Wash was an integral part of the crew — the crazy pilot that saved them and was willing to do things with the ship even though they were not likely to succeed. His warped humor was part of the whole Firefly experience. Without Wash, I’m afraid that there isn’t much show left. Of course, if the future follows the typical Hollywood formula, he’ll be brought back from the dead somehow, or another character that has similar traits will replace him. Either way, it will be really bad. If the intent was to kill off Book’s character and Wash’s death just added “drama”, then a better way to do it would have been to have Book come along to try to help River. He could then have been killed by the Reavers or whatever. I would rather have had both characters remain living, though.

Speaking of Reavers. While some of the background was introduced, it wasn’t quite enough. You would have to have seen the series in order to really appreciate what they were. Even the explanation of how they came into existance wasn’t quite adequate. Also, when they took Serenity into the Reaver section of space, they painted the ship with red paint and put corpses on it. This didn’t make sense at all since none of the Reaver ships that were shown were red or had corpses on the outside. I will say that the chase scene with the Reavers at the beginning was quite enjoyable, and better still, only extras died.

The final space battle with the Reavers was also horribly done. Everything kept jumping around way too fast and you couldn’t tell what was happening, let alone who was who. You could barely make out Serenity itself in all of the chaos. It was almost like the CGI people couldn’t figure out how to do this battle and have it come out on film unless they did lots of very short, very fast closeups. I was sorely dissapointed with that.

The story line at the very end of the movie defies description, and not in a good way. Again, things went back to the typical Hollywood formula — everyone was paired off or it was implied that they would soon be pairing off. There were three tombstones, one for Wash, one for Book and one for “Mr. Universe” who was just a peripheral character, so I don’t know why he was included in that scene. I guess if you’re going to do something badly, why not go all the way with it. River in the co-pilot’s seat taking off was also a bit cheesy.

In reading others reviews, saying this could be the next “Star Wars” or the franchise is re-born, and there was nothing bad about this movie, and I just don’t see it. This movie had a murkey beginning, a clear middle, and a definate end. This story combined several of the previous series stories and wrapped them all up. It will be hard for Mr. Whedon to recover from this and give us good story lines with where the characters ended up.

In conclusion (and this may sound very strange) it was a very good movie, and I’m quite glad I saw it. The aspects above did detract from my overall enjoyment of it, though. If those things were done differently, or principal characters weren’t killed off, then I would have have enjoyed it a whole lot more. The humor and the interplay between the characters kept the movies pace going pretty steadily. The action sequences (with the exception of the last one) were all well done and the characters stayed true to form (except River’s, but that was the main plot line for this movie so it fit in well).

If another movie was in the works (which I’ve heard rumors that there will be) or another TV series was made from it, I’d probably give it another chance. But my personal opinion is that it will have a big initial attraction, but then it will die off again from lukewarm ratings because the characters aren’t the same as they were, and I don’t think it will be able to hold the attention of its audience. I hope I’m wrong, though, and that it does succeed and continue to be “fresh”, but Serenity didn’t give me the feeling that would happen.

marc Movies, Reviews